• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

EDM

Home
Interactive Directory
Introduction and Overview
Introduction
Overview of Guidance Document
Data Management Planning
Data Management Planning Home
Data Management Planning Overview
Data Governance
Data Lifecycle
Data Access, Sharing, and Security
Data Storage, Documentation, and Discovery
Data Disaster Recovery
Data Quality
Data Quality Home
Data Quality Overview 
Analytical Data Quality Review: Verification, Validation, and Usability
Using Data Quality Dimensions to Assess and Manage Data Quality
Considerations for Choosing an Analytical Laboratory 
Active Quality Control During Screening-level Assessments
Field Data Collection
Field Data Collection Home
Introduction to and Overview of Field Data Collection Best Practices
Defining Field Data Categories and Collection Methods
Field Data Collection Process Development Considerations
Field Data Collection Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
Field Data Collection Training Best Practices
Field Data Collection Training Best Practices Training Development Checklist
Other Considerations for Field Data Collection
Data Exchange
Data Exchange Home
Data Exchange Overview
Valid Values
Electronic Data Deliverables and Data Exchange
Data Migration Best Practices
Traditional Ecological Knowledge
Traditional Ecological Knowledge Home
What is Traditional Ecological Knowledge?
Acquiring Traditional Ecological Knowledge Data
Using and Consuming Traditional Ecological Knowledge Data
Managing Traditional Ecological Knowledge Data
Geospatial Data
Geospatial Data Home
Overview of Best Practices for Management of Environmental Geospatial Data
Organizational Standards for Management of Geospatial Data
Geospatial Data Standards
Geospatial Data: GIS Hardware
Geospatial Metadata
Geospatial Data Software
Geospatial Data Collection Consistency
Geospatial Data Field Hardware
Geospatial Data Dissemination: Web Format
Geospatial Visualization of Environmental Data
Public Communications
Public Communications Home
Public Communication and Stakeholder Engagement
Environmental Data Management Systems
Environmental Data Management Systems Home
Environmental Data Management Systems
Case Studies
Case Studies Home
Historical Data Migration Case Study: Filling Minnesota’s Superfund Groundwater Data Accessibility Gap
Case Study: USGS Challenges with secondary use of multi-source water quality monitoring data
LEK Case Study: Collection and Application of Local Ecological Knowledge to Local Environmental Management in Duluth, Minnesota
TEK Case Study: Improving Coastal Resilience in Point Hope, Alaska
Case Study: Integration of Traditional Ecological Knowledge to the Remediation of Abandoned Uranium Sites
Case Study: Local Ecological Knowledge of Historic Anthrax in a Natural Gas Field
Rest in Peace? A Cautionary Tale of Failure to Consult with an Indigenous Community
Case Study: Use of Traditional Ecological Knowledge to Support Revegetation at a Former Uranium Mill Site
Additional Information
Supplemental Resources
References
Acronyms
Glossary
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Navigating this Website
Document Feedback

 

Environmental Data Management (EDM) Best Practices
HOME

Geospatial Metadata

Environmental Data Management Best Practices

Geospatial Data Management
Metadata

As the amount of environmental geospatial data continues to grow, it is important that organizations develop metadata standards as a best data management practice. This document provides an overview of metadata for program and project managers, a list of types of metadata standards, and a list of additional resources so GIS professionals can develop standards for their organization.

Overview

Digitization of environmental data has steadily increased since 2020 (EBJ 2020). Given the availability of environmental data, it is important to document the source of the data. Proper documentation is vital to understanding of source, currency, scale, and appropriate usage of the data set. 

For geospatial data, this documentation is done through metadata. Metadata typically includes information on the data source, spatial reference system, a description of the data, and the provider. It provides information on the quality of the data, the creation of data, and software that was used.  

All organizations should define metadata standards. The Federal Geospatial Data Committee (FGDC) provides guidance for metadata that is outlined in this document. Many states have also developed metadata standards based on the FGDC standards. Consistent metadata standards should be followed across administrative boundaries when possible. Additionally, recipients of federal funds to create or update geospatial data are required to complete metadata for the resulting data set.  

There are resources available for developing and managing metadata. The FGDC and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) are great resources; for example, the USGS provides tools for creating metadata, including tips and tricks and a metadata wizard. The USGS website is linked in Resources.  

Properly completed metadata provide keywords and phrases that are used for online geospatial data discovery searches. Stakeholders can then use metadata to review attributes of data and intended use before downloading and using environmental data published by your organization.  

Components of Metadata 

There are a variety of styles for metadata that are outlined in the section below. Here is a list of all the common components of metadata. (GISGeography 2022) 

  • Identification—provides a brief narrative of your data. In other words, it summarizes the purpose of your data in a succinct way.
    • Title is the name given to the data set. 
    • Description defines the features that are in the data set and what they represent. 
    • Keywords help categorize your data with predefined taxonomy. 
  • Contact—information on who developed and made the data available.
    • Originator is who developed the data set. 
    • Publisher assists in producing, editing, and finalizing the end product. 
    • Distributor focuses on making the data available. 
  • Quality—explains the accuracy and standards the data set follows.
    • Horizontal accuracy evaluates the ground position quality. 
    • Vertical accuracy evaluates the quality of altitude, elevation, or depth data.. 
    • Description quality tests (including completeness, integrity, and inspections of the data) are documented. 
  • Spatial reference—assigns a geographic extent and coordinate system.
    • Projection information includes a projection, datum, and units.  
    • Geographic extent comes in the form of a bounding box, place keyword, or thumbnail. 
  • Entity and attribute—map data type such as points, line, polygons, or grids.
    • Lists the established set of valid values and domains. 
  • Lineage—describes in detail how the data set was constructed.
  • Legal—constraints for accessing and distributing the data.
    • This component describes the liability to ensure protection of privacy and intellectual property.  
    • This component can also include a security classification (for example, confidential, restricted, sensitive, unrestricted, and unclassified) that restricts access or otherwise mitigates security concerns. 
  • Temporal—when the data were collected or updated and how long they are valid.
    • This component can also describe data progress, such as when future updates are scheduled. 
  • Metadata reference—gives a point of contact when there are uncertainties, such as how to cite information.
    • The metadata reference has a temporal component for the date it was created and when it will be revised next.  

Styles of Metadata 

Here is a list of common metadata styles and links to the requirements: 

  • FGDC CSDGM—Federal Geographic Data Committee Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata  
  • ISO 19115—International Standards Organization (ISO) 
  • USEPA—Based on ISO 19115 with additional requirements 
  • Esri—Default metadata standard for organizations that do not need to adhere to a specific standard. (Esri also supports metadata for many of the other metadata styles listed here.) 
  • Inspire—Required by the European Union 
  • MEDIN—Marine Environmental Data and Information Network (United Kingdom)  

Resources 

  • FGDC content standard for digital geospatial metadata (CSDGM) https://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/csdgm-standard 
  • FDGC download geospatial data standards https://www.fgdc.gov/resources/download-geospatial-standards  
  • USGS metadata fact sheet https://geology.usgs.gov/tools/metadata/tools/doc/ctc/ 
  • USGS tools for creating metadata https://geology.usgs.gov/tools/metadata/ 
  • Esri web page on creating standard-compliant metadata https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/manage-data/metadata/creating-standard-compliant-metadata.htm 
  • GISGeography web page “What is Metadata? (Hint: It’s All About the Data)” https://gisgeography.com/gis-metadata/ 
  • USEPA Metadata Editor: https://www.epa.gov/geospatial/epa-metadata-editor 
image_pdfPrint this page/section


EDM

Home
glossaryGlossary
referencesReferences
acronymsAcronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.